Guest Commentary: Furloughs of Federal Employees Can Be Resolved

July 11, 2013 11:22 AM4 comments

This week, more than 650,000 civilian employees of the Department of Defense, including upwards of 72,000 in Virginia, were forced to take the first of 11 unpaid days off due to the failure of Congress to deal with sequestration.

It didn’t have to happen.

Over the last several weeks, more Northern Virginians have contacted my office about the civilian defense furloughs than any other issue. I share the frustration of these dedicated federal employees who, through no fault of their own, are being forced to take an abrupt and unplanned 20 percent pay cut.

For some of these furloughed employees it means they must cancel a summer vacation or put off the purchase of a new car. But for others, the pay cut means that they won’t have the funds to pay their child’s college tuition, cover the co-pay for needed prescription drugs, or even put food on the family table.

Since last August, I have joined other members of our regional congressional delegation, industry leaders, and federal employee groups in calling on Congress to find a balanced alternative to replace the Republican sequester. Since last summer, I have consistently and repeatedly called on the House Majority leadership to cancel recesses and stay in Washington until we resolve the mess.

On several occasions, I took to the House floor to object to Congress going into recess without dealing with sequestration, only to have my microphone shut off and the session gaveled to a close by the presiding Republican member. My entreaties and the pleas of others in Congress repeatedly have fallen on deaf ears among the Republican majority.

If only the House Republicans would appoint negotiators to meet with their Senate counterparts to work out a federal budget that replaces the sequester with a balanced approach that includes responsible deficit reduction, we could end the furloughs and resolve sequestration.

The Senate passed its budget 102 days ago. It is a more responsible plan than the House-passed budget, known as the Ryan budget, which uses smoke and mirrors, pie-in-the-sky economic projections, and draconian cuts to achieve its nebulous goals. Among the many objectionable measures contained in the GOP budget are the privatization of Medicare, increased medical costs for seniors, reductions in the SNAP food stamp program, and provisions to cut needy families and individuals from Medicaid.

So far, House Republicans have refused to name any “conferees” to negotiate a budget compromise with the Senate. House Democrats have named their negotiators and their Senate counterparts are prepared to meet, but they need the House Majority at the negotiating table to move the process forward to reach a comprehensive budget agreement that ends sequestration and furloughs.

The House Majority’s intransigence on the budget and their refusal to replace sequestration has real consequences for many families in Northern Virginia and across the nation. It also will harm our local and national economies, and our military readiness.

Economists estimate that sequestration will result in the loss of more than 2 million jobs nationally, while the Congressional Budget Office projects that sequestration will cut our nation’s rate of economic growth in half this year.

When sequestration was proposed, we were assured that it would never be triggered because Congress would act responsibly and pass legislation that would include more strategic cuts rather than across-the-board cuts that have created the problems we now face. But the House Majority refused to consider responsible measures after many rank-and-file Republican House members balked, fearful of primary challenges from far-right candidates in their conservative congressional districts.

I have always advocated a balanced approach where we pair strategic cuts with revenue enhancements, while maintaining critical investments that ensure our competitiveness in the global economy. We should be using a scalpel, rather than a meat axe approach to budgeting and deficit reduction.

Since the Republicans took over the House Majority in 2011, they have repeatedly and routinely used federal employees as a punching bag. Our federal employees, who are on the front lines protecting and serving the public every day in our communities, have weathered more than two years of a pay freeze with a third pending, and have made sacrifices in pay and benefits totaling more than $100 billion to help reduce our nation’s debt. Now, more than 650,000 of them must face another 20 percent reduction in pay.

I urge every Falls Church News-Press reader to take a moment to imagine they are facing an arbitrary 20 percent pay cut, and how it would impact their family budget and their quality of life. Given the concentration of federal employees in Northern Virginia, many of those facing these latest pay cuts are our neighbors and our friends. They serve our nation with distinction and deserve to be treated fairly.

 


Gerry Connolly (D) represents Virginia’s 11th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives.

 

  • JeffreyBee

    President Obama signed the bill the made the furlough happen and claimed it would never occur.

    The lesson here is never approve of a really bad idea just because you don’t think it will ever happen.

  • Pingback: Guest Commentary: Furloughs of Federal Employees Can Be Resolved | West-Virginia News

  • Fred Packer

    There are millions of Americans who think furloughing federal civilian employees is a good idea. Second only to the idea of getting rid of many of those jobs completely. Scary concept to the FC crowd, I know, but that’s the way it is.

  • Joe

    I’m sorry these employees will have to take 11 furlough days, but that pales in comparison to what their counterparts in the private sector have suffered the last few years. Many private sector employees were out of work for months or even years through no fault of their own, and many who got new jobs had to take significant pay cuts. I ought to know. After being out of full-time work for several years I took a new job at just over half of my previous base pay. I no longer have health insurance, paid holidays or any of the other benefits federal employees and some in the private sector enjoy.

    • Liz

      I’m sorry Joe but you should be advocating for private jobs that have the same benefits that you seem to think government jobs have instead of hoping for government jobs to become worse. You are falling into the trap that pits the middle class and poor Americans against each other instead of putting the blame where it really lies, the rich getting richer at the expense of everyone else.

Facebook Iconfacebook like buttonTwitter Icontwitter follow buttonGoogle+Google+