As Republicans in the Senate moved forward Tuesday on legislation which would lead to millions more uninsured Americans, their colleagues in the House took a vote which got far less attention.
H.J. Res. 111, which passed the House on an almost-straight party-line vote, would allow predatory practices to return to consumer financial products. The Senate still has to pass the measure for it to take effect, but it is deeply concerning.
H.J. Res. 111 prevents the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from protecting you from a predatory practice called “mandatory” or “binding arbitration.”
Many Americans don’t learn about forced or binding arbitration until it happens to them, because binding arbitration clauses are buried in the fine print of everyday contracts. Americans unknowingly sign a contract waiving their right to sue when they apply for a credit card, or get a phone, cable or internet service. It’s buried in the fine print.
We call it the “ripoff clause.”
After advocacy from consumer groups and Members of Congress (including me), the CFPB issued a rule last year to protect Americans from forced arbitration. Sadly, Republicans have now voted to end that rule, and the consumer protections it created.
If those who voted for this measure have their way, powerful corporations and special interests will again be able to keep ordinary people from getting their day in court. The measure would allow companies to circumvent the courts, and bar people from joining together in class-action lawsuits.
Remember when Wells Fargo created fake accounts on behalf of costumers without their consent? People couldn’t sue Wells Fargo because the contracts they signed required them to go to arbitration.
As a small business owner, I hate binding arbitration. A business doesn’t need it to succeed, it’s just unfair to your customers.
Credit card companies, banks, and other financial institutions should not be able to take away our legal rights. Our judicial system should be a level playing field.
I voted against this attempt to end consumer rights, and I will keep speaking out against forced arbitration and the ripoff clause.
Rep. Donald Beyer can be reached through his website at www.beyer.house.gov, on Twitter @RepDonBeyer or his office at (202) 225-4376.
Congressman Beyer’s News Commentary: Republicans Vote Against Financial Protections
Donald Beyer
H.J. Res. 111, which passed the House on an almost-straight party-line vote, would allow predatory practices to return to consumer financial products. The Senate still has to pass the measure for it to take effect, but it is deeply concerning.
H.J. Res. 111 prevents the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from protecting you from a predatory practice called “mandatory” or “binding arbitration.”
Many Americans don’t learn about forced or binding arbitration until it happens to them, because binding arbitration clauses are buried in the fine print of everyday contracts. Americans unknowingly sign a contract waiving their right to sue when they apply for a credit card, or get a phone, cable or internet service. It’s buried in the fine print.
We call it the “ripoff clause.”
After advocacy from consumer groups and Members of Congress (including me), the CFPB issued a rule last year to protect Americans from forced arbitration. Sadly, Republicans have now voted to end that rule, and the consumer protections it created.
If those who voted for this measure have their way, powerful corporations and special interests will again be able to keep ordinary people from getting their day in court. The measure would allow companies to circumvent the courts, and bar people from joining together in class-action lawsuits.
Remember when Wells Fargo created fake accounts on behalf of costumers without their consent? People couldn’t sue Wells Fargo because the contracts they signed required them to go to arbitration.
As a small business owner, I hate binding arbitration. A business doesn’t need it to succeed, it’s just unfair to your customers.
Credit card companies, banks, and other financial institutions should not be able to take away our legal rights. Our judicial system should be a level playing field.
I voted against this attempt to end consumer rights, and I will keep speaking out against forced arbitration and the ripoff clause.
Rep. Donald Beyer can be reached through his website at www.beyer.house.gov, on Twitter @RepDonBeyer or his office at (202) 225-4376.
Recent News
74 U.S. Representatives Warn Trump Administration To Halt Potentially Illegal Mass Firings Of Federal WorkersRepresentatives demand comes ahead of reported purge of State Department workers
July 11, 2025 (Washington, D.C.) – Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) today led 74 U.S. Representatives in pressing the Trump Administration
F1: The Movie In Theaters
Lisa Released on June 27, this is a big sports drama about professional auto racing and personalities behind the scenes.
Old Falls Church: School Days (Part I)
I was born in early 1938, and started first grade during World War Two. At that time the town of
Our Man In Arlington 7-10-2025
For my “Front-Page History” series, today we are looking at headlines from July 2, 1977, just one day after the
A Penny for Your Thoughts 7-10-2025
Hope may be a theological virtue, an inspiration or an aspiration, even a town in Arkansas, but hope is not
Cult Century: 1970s Roots Of Trumpism, Part 8 of 25
“Whoever oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God” Proverbs 14:31.
Stories that may interest you
74 U.S. Representatives Warn Trump Administration To Halt Potentially Illegal Mass Firings Of Federal WorkersRepresentatives demand comes ahead of reported purge of State Department workers
July 11, 2025 (Washington, D.C.) – Congressman Don Beyer (D-VA) today led 74 U.S. Representatives in pressing the Trump Administration to halt plans to conduct further mass firings of federal
F1: The Movie In Theaters
Lisa Released on June 27, this is a big sports drama about professional auto racing and personalities behind the scenes. Brad Pitt continues to defy his age in the action
Old Falls Church: School Days (Part I)
I was born in early 1938, and started first grade during World War Two. At that time the town of Falls Church had only three schools: Madison (a grade school),
Our Man In Arlington 7-10-2025
For my “Front-Page History” series, today we are looking at headlines from July 2, 1977, just one day after the new Virginia laws passed by the General Assembly went into